Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: alpha: naming for dtb faults

2011-06-09 Thread Ali Saidi

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/741/#review1316
---

Ship it!


looks fine.

- Ali


On 2011-06-08 23:25:03, Korey Sewell wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/741/
> ---
> 
> (Updated 2011-06-08 23:25:03)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and 
> Nathan Binkert.
> 
> 
> Summary
> ---
> 
> alpha: naming for dtb faults
> Just "dfault" gets confusing while debugging. Why not
> differentiate whether it's an access violation or page
> fault
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   src/arch/alpha/faults.cc 77d12d8f7971 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/741/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Korey
> 
>

___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: alpha: naming for dtb faults

2011-06-09 Thread Gabe Black

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/741/#review1310
---


This seems reasonable to me, but we should consider if the old name was the 
actual name given by the architecture. I'm not that familiar with Alpha so I 
have no idea. If it was, then you could do something like "dfault (paging)" and 
"dfault (perm)" or similar and preserve the old name for the sake of looking 
things up in a manual.

- Gabe


On 2011-06-08 23:25:03, Korey Sewell wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/741/
> ---
> 
> (Updated 2011-06-08 23:25:03)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and 
> Nathan Binkert.
> 
> 
> Summary
> ---
> 
> alpha: naming for dtb faults
> Just "dfault" gets confusing while debugging. Why not
> differentiate whether it's an access violation or page
> fault
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   src/arch/alpha/faults.cc 77d12d8f7971 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/741/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Korey
> 
>

___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


[gem5-dev] Review Request: alpha: naming for dtb faults

2011-06-08 Thread Korey Sewell

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/741/
---

Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and Nathan 
Binkert.


Summary
---

alpha: naming for dtb faults
Just "dfault" gets confusing while debugging. Why not
differentiate whether it's an access violation or page
fault


Diffs
-

  src/arch/alpha/faults.cc 77d12d8f7971 

Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/741/diff


Testing
---


Thanks,

Korey

___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev