Re: [m5-dev] [PATCH] [mq]: switchtotimingsimplecpu.diff

2009-02-11 Thread nathan binkert
I'm cleaning out my inbox and I was wondering if this ever got resolved. David? It would be nice to see this whole interface cleaned up (across all CPUs), so if anyone understands what's going on here, I'd appreciate some info. Nate On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Clint Smullen

Re: [m5-dev] [PATCH] [mq]: switchtotimingsimplecpu.diff

2009-01-07 Thread Clint Smullen
This patch is unrelated to switching back from detailedd. I have still not finished fixing everything (and, when I get a chance, I need to post some questions about it). I'm not sure why this patch is needed, since in takeOverFrom, at that point, _status is set to Running. Then, later on,

Re: [m5-dev] [PATCH] [mq]: switchtotimingsimplecpu.diff

2009-01-06 Thread nathan binkert
I feel like I'm missing some context with this patch (though I will admit to not following the mailing list very closely after the last few months. Was this the solution to us not being able to switch back to timing from detailed? Can you write up a commit message? At first glance, it seems