---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/616/
---
Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and Nathan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/616/#review1038
---
This is a great change. I saw one style mistake, and also I think some
On 2011-03-30 09:53:54, Gabe Black wrote:
src/arch/arm/types.hh, line 350
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/616/diff/1/?file=11348#file11348line350
You could add new fields to the ITSTATE bitunion that would make this
easier. cond and mask could be SubBitUnions which can be treated as
On 2011-03-30 09:53:54, Gabe Black wrote:
src/arch/arm/types.hh, line 350
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/616/diff/1/?file=11348#file11348line350
You could add new fields to the ITSTATE bitunion that would make this
easier. cond and mask could be SubBitUnions which can be treated as