Re: [gem5-users] Printing stats in ROI

2019-10-25 Thread Victor Kariofillis
I have figured out how to it. I added a boolean named roi in the system.hh header file, right after the totalNumInsts variable. This is now available in src/mem/cache/base.cc, so I can print the cache data only in the region of interest of the benchmarks. I'm also interested in changing the

[gem5-users] virtual address support for prefetchers

2019-10-25 Thread Majid Jalili
When I enable the use_virtual_addresses ans start feeding the prefetchers with VA address, I see no translation happening, and I ended up with situation where all new addresses are dropped because the reference to tlb is null. Any help is appreciated. use_virtual_addresses = Param.Bool(True,

Re: [gem5-users] Do I need to re-create checkpoints if I change the CPU model parameters

2019-10-25 Thread Iago .
Alright thanks! De: Ciro Santilli Enviado: sexta-feira, 25 de outubro de 2019 13:58 Para: gem5-users@gem5.org ; iagosilvestr...@hotmail.com Assunto: Re: [gem5-users] Do I need to re-create checkpoints if I change the CPU model parameters Considering that you

[gem5-users] Aborted (core dumped) When trying to run HPI full system simulation with 4 cores

2019-10-25 Thread Iago .
I sucessfully booted the simulation with HPI cpu model with one core but whenever I try to run it with 4 I get an error. panic: panic condition (pkt->needsWritable() != pkt->isInvalidate()) && !pkt->req->isCacheMaintenance() occurred: global got snoop WriteReq [80945000:80945003] UC where

Re: [gem5-users] Do I need to re-create checkpoints if I change the CPU model parameters

2019-10-25 Thread Ciro Santilli
Considering that you can even checkpoint from completely different CPUs such at Atomic and restore to HPI, I would expect that such HPI changes will also magically just work. From: gem5-users on behalf of Iago . Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 5:22 PM To:

[gem5-users] Do I need to re-create checkpoints if I change the CPU model parameters

2019-10-25 Thread Iago .
I have been trying to use HPI cpu model in my control algorithm performance study and searching for more info on it I found that the default HPI parameters set the l1 cache latency to 1 which seems to be very low, If I already created checkpoints with this CPU model can i just alter the

Re: [gem5-users] ARM HPI model not working on latest version of GEM5

2019-10-25 Thread Ciro Santilli
Thanks for the report Javed, I reproduce on other configs as well e.g. se.py. This seems to have been caused by 9d3b9e96c56386ee6539657c21cba95e118e576a. I'm not very familiar with the ports, and could not fix it immediately, I'll have a look later on if Gabe doesn't get a chance to fix it

[gem5-users] ARM HPI model not working on latest version of GEM5

2019-10-25 Thread Javed Osmany
Hello I cloned a cleaned version of GEM5 from the repository and got the ARM Isa gem5.opt built. However, when I run the simple hello world test for the HPI() arm model, I am getting the following error: [j00533938@lhrplinux1 gem5]$ ./build/ARM/gem5.opt configs/example/arm/starter_se.py