Hi, I'm studying cache using gem5 FS Mode (ARM)
I want to know difference of three Cache latency - tag latency, data latency, response latency
( especially what is a response latency ?? )
___
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
Thanks for the reply.
I understand it
From: "Abhishek Singh"
To: "gem5 users mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, 11 December, 2019 11:14:47
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Gem5 Cache
Hi,
See the options for se.py or fs.py depending on what mode you are using.
On Wed, Dec
--
> *From: *"Abhishek Singh"
> *To: *"gem5-users"
> *Sent: *Wednesday, 11 December, 2019 10:03:25
> *Subject: *Re: [gem5-users] Gem5 Cache
>
> Check config/common/Caches.py
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 11:32 PM DURAIRAJ J <2016506...@annauniv.edu.in>
Thanks for the reply.
Is there any way to specify it by using simulation command
From: "Abhishek Singh"
To: "gem5-users"
Sent: Wednesday, 11 December, 2019 10:03:25
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Gem5 Cache
Check config/common/Caches.py
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at
Hi Chetan,
Try to set num-l2caches 8 (same the number of cpu). If doesn't work try to
used ruby_fs.py. i hope it work for you.
As far as I know default gem5 cache line size that can be used are 16, 32,
64 and 128. I tried to modify that can used 256 bytes too in
common/Caches.py, but
Probably something you will need to fix if you change the cache line size
away from 64 bytes, would be great if you could post back the patch to fix
the issue.
Thanks,
Jack
Jack Harvard
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Chetan Patil chtpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to simulate X86
Hi,
I am trying to simulate X86 with varying cache line size. Following are the
arguments I pass for Full System Mode simulation:
build/X86/gem5.opt configs/example/fs.py --num-cpus=8 --caches
--l1d_size=16kB --l1i_size=16kB --num-l2caches=1 --l2cache --l2_size=1MB
--cacheline_size=64
Mahmood,
I have comfirmed that sleep() function executes. Besides that,
simulation execution on host machine takes longer but execution time
value (sim_seconds) in stat file does not show a significant difference.
Alinti Mahmood Naderan mahmood...@gmail.com
Sanem,
maybe you put sleep()
That is a normal thing. sim_second is a workload related parameter
while simulation execution on the host is related to your host, e.g
wall time.
Assume you are simulating single core at 2GHz frequency. As a result
simulating 1 second of your workload takes 2*10^9 cycles. If you write
a good code
...@gem5.org] en nombre de
Mahmood Naderan [mahmood...@gmail.com]
Enviado: sábado, 05 de abril de 2014 19:48
Para: Sanem Arslan
CC: gem5 users mailing list
Asunto: Re: [gem5-users] gem5 cache latency, impact on performance
That is a normal thing. sim_second is a workload related parameter
while
.
De: gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org [gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org] en
nombre de Mahmood Naderan [mahmood...@gmail.com]
Enviado: sábado, 05 de abril de 2014 19:48
Para: Sanem Arslan
CC: gem5 users mailing list
Asunto: Re: [gem5-users] gem5 cache latency, impact on performance
Hi all,
I am using classic memory system and I have added several codes to
the cache_impl.hh and blk.hh files. However I cannot see the
performance overhead of these added codes on the gem5 execution time.
I have increased cache latency parameters from CacheConfig.py file
and I can see
Dear All,
I am very new to using gem5 simulator. Below is my need
I need to create a particular cache hierarchical architecture in gem5 and
do varied simulations with the traces I have and need to conclude on the
usability and validity of the new architecture.
This needs both protocol as well
On Wed, January 23, 2013 3:14 am, preethi pd wrote:
Dear All,
I am very new to using gem5 simulator. Below is my need
I need to create a particular cache hierarchical architecture in gem5 and
do varied simulations with the traces I have and need to conclude on the
usability and validity of
There are two different memory systems in gem5: classic and ruby. It seems
that neither are a complete fit for your case. But I would like to claim
that ruby is a better choice. Others might have a different opinion.
Comments below are with respect to the ruby memory system.
On Wed, January 23,
15 matches
Mail list logo
