Thanks Jason. I'll try to fix it and possibly submit a patch.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Jason Lowe-Power
wrote:
> To directly answer your question: The labeling of instruction in gem5 is
> not accurate at all. Feel free to fix the labeling and submit a patch to
> reviews.gem5.org, thoug
Hi, all,
I successfully build all benchmarks from spec2006 with x86 linux gcc.
And most benchmarks can run properly on my server.
However, for 403.gcc (an important benchmark for research), it may encounter
segmentation faults and crash.
I run 403.gcc with ref inputs.
the reported output is show
Hi,
I suspect you are running in atomic mode. Make sure you are using the O3Cpu or
MinorCpu.
Andreas
From: gem5-users
mailto:gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org>> on behalf of
Faeze Banitaba mailto:banitaba_...@yahoo.com>>
Reply-To: Faeze Banitaba
mailto:banitaba_...@yahoo.com>>, gem5 users mailing
Hello,
I think there may be a couple of mistakes in your command line:
"./build/ARM/gem5.opt configs/example/se.py --ruby --cpu-type timing -c
testa/test-progs/hello/bin/X86/linux/hello"
First, it looks like you've build gem5 with support for the ARM ISA, but
you're trying to run an X86 binary. I
To directly answer your question: The labeling of instruction in gem5 is
not accurate at all. Feel free to fix the labeling and submit a patch to
reviews.gem5.org, though! We'd welcome the fixes.
BTW, you're correct that SIMD instructions are labeled as floating point
instructions. I've noticed th
Hi,
I want to simulate MESI cache coherence protocol using snoop
filtering. For this simulation i used the following command :
./build/ARM/gem5.opt configs/example/se.py --ruby --cpu-type timing -c
testa/test-progs/hello/bin/X86/linux/hello
but it gave the following error
Traceback (most
