Hi,
I feel compiling gem5 is taking longer than what it should take for me. I
was wondering if anyone can measure and report for this scenario:
[a routine scenario happens when we debug]:
Compile gem5. Then touch one cc file, and then recompile with the command
below:
time scons
Hi Tom. The data could have been written there as the result of a system
call which would not have executed as instructions in gem5, or it could
have been part of the initial binary. The address looks like a stack
address, so there's a good chance it came from a system call.
I'm just guessing,
I just built the gem5 library following the instructions in the README and
it built fine. What namespace errors did you see? That sounds to me like
some part of your code base isn't up to date, since gem5 reworked its
namespaces a little while ago. I do see that the errors in your
Hi Matt P,
Any feedback for my question below regarding stats (stats.txt) to check for
overall improvements due to reduced latency?
Thanks,
David
From: David Fong via gem5-users
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 9:35 AM
To: Poremba, Matthew ; Matt Sinclair
; gem5 users mailing list
Cc: Kyle
Hi Chen,
I also had problems when trying to run benchmarks with thread
synchronization on gem5 + FS + x86 + classic memory system. I described the
problem here
https://lists.gem5.org/archives/list/gem5-users@gem5.org/thread/MGIFEDFF6YRF2U764PWZJE7WOZC7BP3T/#AYN6SMZ6ISEZ755LKHV7BCIJJBRXZRPS
After
Hi Jason,
Thanks for your reply! It's great to hear from you.
I was running SE mode with x86 ISA and classic caches, using the following
configuration.
build/X86/gem5.opt configs/example/se.py \
--caches --l3cache \
--cmd=test_progs/arm_lock/arm_lock \
--num-cpus=4
Hi Jason,
Thanks a lot for your help! I've solved this problem.
Sincerely,
Liyan Chen
___
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s