Re: [gem5-users] FS simulation with Garnet 2.0

I solved that problem also. This problem is basically related to gem5 versioning. I think after garnet 2.0, Gem5 should publish a new stable version. This problem is related to below link- https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/2380/ I also obtained the results for simple network with --n 4.

Re: [gem5-users] FS simulation with Garnet 2.0

Garnet_standalone is a different dummy protocol which consumes every message so it'll work. It's not realistic. Try with other coherence protocols perhaps ... Cheers, Tushar On May 5, 2017, at 2:21 PM, F. A. Faisal > wrote: I tried simple

Re: [gem5-users] FS simulation with Garnet 2.0

I tried simple network option. However, the result is the same. Please let me know, if I am missing any option to add (I used all the default settings). However, I also run the garent_standalone protocol with the default settings, which runs properly. ./build/ALPHA/gem5.opt configs/example/fs.py

Re: [gem5-users] FS simulation with Garnet 2.0

Hmm the coherence protocol seems to have received an invalid transaction. Not sure why. This does not seem to be a network issue. But for a sanity check, run with network=simple and see if it still fails. Cheers, Tushar On May 5, 2017, at 11:46 AM, F. A. Faisal

Re: [gem5-users] FS simulation with Garnet 2.0

Thanks a lot. I already figured out that problem by myself. However, I encountered a new problem in running 4 core 4 threads blackscholes benchmarks. It shows system panic. I also tried for 16 cpu and Mesh network, which is still running more than 8 hours. I used the mesh_xy topology along with

[gem5-users] FS simulation with Garnet 2.0

Hi, I like to invoke the garnet 2.0 for running the benchmark programs Parsec 2.1. However, previous ruby_fs.py file located at configs/example/ folder is not available with the current gem5 source, which could invoke the garnet 1.0. And now the replaced fs.py file don't have option like-