Re: [gem5-users] Garnet 2.0 + How the dir_nodes are connected in Mesh_XY network

2017-09-07 Thread Tushar Krishna
Let me re-phrase your question: if a topology has more than one link in the same “direction” (say flattened butterfly where there might be multiple links going “east”), then your question is whether they need to be given unique port names or not. By default, the port names are not used by

Re: [gem5-users] Garnet 2.0 + How the dir_nodes are connected in Mesh_XY network

2017-09-07 Thread F. A. Faisal
Dear Professor, Many many thanks for your earliest reply. Howerver, I like to ask more detailed about the 2 point. 2. Now, as mentioned in the figure of Mesh_XY at homepage of garnet 2.0, two links are connected between two routers (one incomming and outgoing). However, if we see the below

Re: [gem5-users] Garnet 2.0 + How the dir_nodes are connected in Mesh_XY network

2017-08-31 Thread Tushar Krishna
Hi Faisal, > On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:17 AM, F. A. Faisal wrote: > > Dear All, > > 1. I cross-checked the code for Mesh_XY.py and MeshDirCorners_XY.py file. > Where, in the MeshDirCorners_XY.py has the proper implementation of the > connected dir_nodes. > However, I

[gem5-users] Garnet 2.0 + How the dir_nodes are connected in Mesh_XY network

2017-08-31 Thread F. A. Faisal
Dear All, 1. I cross-checked the code for Mesh_XY.py and MeshDirCorners_XY.py file. Where, in the MeshDirCorners_XY.py has the proper implementation of the connected dir_nodes. However, I couldn't find any code that connectes the dir_nodes with each router inside the Mesh_XY.py file. 2. Now, as