[Gen-art] Re: [Mip6] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-05

2007-09-14 Thread Francis Dupont
In your previous mail you wrote: unless you bind the IPsec security association to the home address, an attacker could send a Binding Update message with a spoofed home address using its own IPsec SA. The correspondent node's IPsec instance would accept that message and hand it

[Gen-art] Gen-ART re-review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05

2007-09-14 Thread Pasi.Eronen
Updating my Gen-ART Last Call review: My comment #2 is addressed by the RFC Editor note currently in the tracker; and comment #3 has been taken care of as well. Comment #1 could be addressed by RFC Editor note, too, as suggested by the authors (email from Jean-Louis Le Roux on May 30th): So

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of IETF LC draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-07.txt

2007-09-14 Thread Thomas Narten
Hi Miguel. Thanks for your comments. Miguel Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas, Harald: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please