I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html.
Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.
Document:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve
these comments along with any other comments you may receive.
Document:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve
these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
Document:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve
these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
Document:
At 08:08 AM 11/15/2009, Sean Turner wrote:
...
None of my comments on draft -05 were addressed in draft -06. They
were as follows:
Sean, your comments on -05 were received on 10/17.
Version -06 has not been produced yet, and
draft -05 was deferred before the previous telechat.
Al
bmwg chair
Hi.
fwiw, I find myself strongly agreeing with what I believe is
Brian's main point, although what I infer from it may be a
little different from what he does (or may not... I'm not sure):
We should not be adopting a patch protocol that lacks both the
tools for, or a serious discussion of,
Yes, I was waiting to make sure all relevant comments had been given
before spending the day incorporating. I hadn't gotten notification
that all were but since there were no more emails with any comments
for last 3 weeks it's safe to assume that no more are coming.
Just for future
My bad. I must still be jet lagged.
There are normally GEN-Art and SEC-DIR reviews. Sometimes there's also
an OPS-DIR review. To see what IESG members had to say:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ballot/3192/
spt
Merike Kaeo wrote:
Yes, I was waiting to make sure all relevant
First, thanks!
The following changes have been submitted as a -04 revision.
-Original Message-
From: Avshalom Houri [mailto:avsha...@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:25 AM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav; rom...@gmail.com; General Area Review Team
Cc: .Lisa Dusseault
Subject:
On Nov 15, 2009, at 12:03 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
Hi.
fwiw, I find myself strongly agreeing with what I believe is
Brian's main point, although what I infer from it may be a
little different from what he does (or may not... I'm not sure):
We should not be adopting a patch protocol that
On 11/15/09 11:54 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Nov 15, 2009, at 12:03 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
Hi.
fwiw, I find myself strongly agreeing with what I believe is
Brian's main point, although what I infer from it may be a
little different from what he does (or may not... I'm not sure):
We
11 matches
Mail list logo
