Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-05.txt

2013-07-02 Thread Francis Dupont
In your previous mail you wrote: > > - 1 page 3: take benefit of the first "Extended Reports" to introduce > > the XR abbrev > > It is in the title, but I've expanded it at first occurrence in text. => the convention is to consider the title and the abstract as other independent parts of th

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-avp-codecs-02.txt

2013-07-02 Thread Timothy B. Terriberry
Brian E Carpenter wrote: According to normal practice, the abstract should also specifically mention RFC 3551: "This document updates the RTP/AVP profile (RFC 3551)..." Thanks Brian, done. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.o

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-10.txt

2013-07-02 Thread Francis Dupont
In your previous mail you wrote: > > Minor issues: None > > OK. Thanks but it appears the document is headed back to another WGLC > due to other comments, mostly due to the RtgDir review comments. => yes, I saw that. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > - ToC page 3 and 7 page 12: Acknowle

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-merkle-tls-brainpool-02

2013-07-02 Thread Johannes Merkle
a new version addressing your review is on its way. Johannes Roni Even schrieb am 30.06.2013 08:44: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > . > > Please resolve these comm