In your previous mail you wrote: > > Minor issues: None > > OK. Thanks but it appears the document is headed back to another WGLC > due to other comments, mostly due to the RtgDir review comments.
=> yes, I saw that. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > - ToC page 3 and 7 page 12: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments > > It appears that both spellings are acceptable according to my spell > checker. I will leave as is unless there is continued objection. => Acknowledgements is UK English, Acknowledgments is US English. The usage is more for US English but anyway it is something for the RFC Editor... > > - 3 page 5 (component link): the term NPO is used before being defined > > > > - 3 page 5 (component link): expand the WDM abbrev -- not well known > > according tothe RFC Editor list: > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt > > > > - 3 page 5 (flow identification): same for the PW abbrev > > A last call comment from our AD is to expand all acronyms before use. > The SecDir comments also requested this. => not a bad policy anyway even the official one makes this optional for well known acronyms (the acronyms with a star in the list, e.g., it is not really required to expand TCP/IP :-). > I will also do a full spell check and see what else the spell checker > find. (I am using International Ispell Version 3.3.02 12 Jun 2005 > with English and American English dictionary files). => I use the same but by default with only the American English one (even I have the UK and of course the French (from France) dicts too). Thanks francis.dup...@fdupont.fr _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
