Thanks for the review, Elwyn. Ice, is a new version upcoming? (The telechat is
in a moment… just wanted to check that we’ve not forgotten anything, it is of
course fine to collect various changes to a draft revision that you’ll post
after the call as well.)
Jari
On 14 Nov 2014, at 20:07,
FWIW, I have followed this discussion.
I have to say that IBS would not necessarily be my first choice of crypto
solutions, particularly in a standards track spec. But it is interesting. I do
not mind the definition of a new ICV with IBS. But it does have the issues
Stephen and and Martin
thanks for your review!
On 27 Oct 2014, at 08:05, Meral Shirazipour meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com
wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these
Thanks Jari
The choice is very much based on the intended characteristics of ad hoc
networks. In particular the property that you can add new participants to a
network without letting anyone already in the network know you are doing this
until they turn up in your neighbourhood discovery, and
Is there a response to this? It seems important that the ranges are correct.
Jari
On 24 Nov 2014, at 09:21, Meral Shirazipour meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com
wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at
thanks for your review!
authors: was there a response to Ben’s observations?
i have balloted no-obj.
jari
On 03 Nov 2014, at 22:08, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
Thanks for your review, Roni!
Jari
On 23 Oct 2014, at 15:46, Roni Even ron.even@gmail.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments
Hi Jari, Elwyn,
I missed Elwyn’s response during my travel the last couple of weeks, sorry
about that.
I think Elwyn and I are in sync on the error handling. I’ll make a small
modification that Elwyn suggest below. There are a few minor updates I like to
do, will try to do that by the end of
Thanks for your review, Russ!
Jari
On 20 Nov 2014, at 00:54, Russ Housley hous...@vigilsec.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments
Thanks for your review, Christer!
On 18 Nov 2014, at 01:08, Christer Holmberg christer.holmb...@ericsson.com
wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq
Document:
Thanks for the review. (Were the comments adopted by the authors? This review
is from August, but I cannot see a response…)
Jari
On 03 Aug 2014, at 21:37, Alexey Melnikov alexey.melni...@isode.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see
Thank you Robert for the review, and thank you authors for the updates in -15!
I have balloted no-obj for this document in today’s IESG telechat.
Jari
On 21 Nov 2014, at 21:19, Robert Sparks rjspa...@nostrum.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Thank you very much Francis and Carlos.
Jari
On 29 Oct 2014, at 15:52, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) cpign...@cisco.com
wrote:
Many thanks, Francis, for this review! All nits acknowledged and fixed.
Thanks,
Carlos.
On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Francis Dupont francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-mibs-to-ieee80231-01.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20141104
IETF LC End Date: 20141106
IESG Telechat date: 20141125
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Thanks, Dan and Barry.
Is there a new rev or RFC Editor -notes?
On 20 Nov 2014, at 15:13, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) droma...@avaya.com wrote:
Hi Barry,
This looks reasonable, thanks for the timely response and for addressing my
comments. I suggest that the editor also fixes the text in
I agree with many of these comments (were they observed?) but I also agree with
the part about “ship it” :-)
Jari
On 01 Nov 2014, at 06:10, Martin Thomson martin.thom...@gmail.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
Jari, Meral,
Eric had changed of email address.
I have forwarded him the review when it came out.
He took note but said he would submit the updated draft few weeks after
due to the pre-IETF submission cut-off.
I guess it should come out soon.
However, I am not sure about the change, but I'll
There will be a revised I-D.
Barry
On Tuesday, November 25, 2014, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@ericsson.com wrote:
Thanks, Dan and Barry.
Is there a new rev or RFC Editor -notes?
On 20 Nov 2014, at 15:13, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) droma...@avaya.com
javascript:; wrote:
Hi Barry,
This looks
I just posted the -09 version of the draft, which has the requested
changes (including most of Meral's suggestions and also including the
typos pointed out today by Martin).
I changed the start of the mLDP range to 0x43; the choice of 0x41 is
also defensible (as Martin has argued), but it is
Hi,
Thank you for the changes, latest version
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-mldp-nlri-08 looks good.
Best regards,
Meral
-Original Message-
From: Eric C Rosen [mailto:ero...@juniper.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 11:41 AM
To: Martin Vigoureux; Jari Arkko;
On 25 November 2014 at 07:59, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@ericsson.com wrote:
I agree with many of these comments (were they observed?) but I also agree
with the part about “ship it” :-)
I have not seen a response.
___
Gen-art mailing list
On 25/11/14 22:26, Martin Thomson wrote:
On 25 November 2014 at 07:59, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@ericsson.com wrote:
I agree with many of these comments (were they observed?) but I also agree
with the part about “ship it” :-)
I have not seen a response.
I asked Viktor to produce one. He's
On 11/25/2014 09:50 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
Thanks for the review. (Were the comments adopted by the authors? This review
is from August, but I cannot see a response…)
So, just to update the RMCAT crew, this document was approved on today's
telechat, pending comment disposition.
On the
23 matches
Mail list logo