Thank you Paul for the in-depth review, and for the discussion, and thank you
Donald for the edits.
At this point I think I’m ready to say “no-objection” for this document in
tonight’s IESG telechat.
Jari
On 07 Jul 2016, at 01:02, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> On 7/6/16 5:18
On 7/6/16 5:18 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
Donald,
On 7/5/16 9:51 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Hi Paul,
Version -09 has been uploaded with the intent that it resolve your
comments.
Looks good except for
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> Donald,
>
> On 7/5/16 9:51 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Version -09 has been uploaded with the intent that it resolve your
>> comments.
>
>
> Looks good except for one thing:
>
> Some of the
Donald,
On 7/5/16 9:51 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Hi Paul,
Version -09 has been uploaded with the intent that it resolve your comments.
Looks good except for one thing:
Some of the new text in section 7 has me baffled:
The following processes should be followed in interpreting sets of
Hi Paul,
Version -09 has been uploaded with the intent that it resolve your comments.
Thanks,
Donald
===
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
d3e...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Paul Kyzivat
On 7/4/16 11:35 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Hi Paul,
I believe we are generally in agreement.
On the table in the IANA Considerations, I have read
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-15#section-1.1
and I can understand why you commented as you did. But, since all the
Hi Paul,
I believe we are generally in agreement.
On the table in the IANA Considerations, I have read
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-15#section-1.1
and I can understand why you commented as you did. But, since all the
table entries were created by IANA actions, I
Donald,
On 7/4/16 5:26 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your comments. Sorry for the delay in response.
Please see below.
No problem. I was just concerned that my review hadn't been received.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Paul Kyzivat
wrote:
I am
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your comments. Sorry for the delay in response.
Please see below.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Paul Kyzivat
wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being