Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14

> On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:20, Martin Duke wrote: > > Hi Stewart, > > If there are no further objections, I'm going to declare consensus. > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 1:45 PM Martin Duke > wrote: > Stewart, > > do we need more cycles for this, or is draft-15

Re: [Gen-art] [tcpm] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14

> On 18 Jun 2020, at 12:01, Gorry Fairhurst wrote: > > > > See a few comments (marked GF) from the perspective of other transport RFCs, > in case this helps you find text... > > Forwarded Message > Subject: Re: [tcpm] Genart last call review of >

Re: [Gen-art] [tcpm] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14

See a few comments (marked GF) from the perspective of other transport RFCs, in case this helps you find text... Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [tcpm] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14 Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:00:15 +0100 From: Stewart Bryant

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14

Here is how we should proceed. We make as much progress as we can agree on which will clear some of the issue below. For any remaining issues for which you have wider consensus but where we cannot agree, I modify my review and the IESG decides how they wish to proceed. I am prepared to be in

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14

Last comment first ... > We are getting there, but I would ask that you take the transport > hat off and look again from an infrastructure and packet transport > perspective. I don't view this as looking at it from a transport vs. infrastructure perspective. And, I am not disagreeing with your

[Gen-art] Review Assignments

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: For telechat 2020-06-25 Reviewer Type LC end Draft Robert Sparks Telechat 2020-05-13 draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-11 (-09 lc reviewed) Last calls: Reviewer Type LC end Draft Francis

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-15

Hi Francesca, Thanks for your review and comments. Please see my answers inline. Thanks, Yingzhen On 6/16/20, 11:56 AM, "Francesca Palombini via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Francesca Palombini Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14

> We make as much progress as we can agree on which will clear some > of the issue below. > For any remaining issues for which you have wider consensus but > where we cannot agree, I modify my review and the IESG decides how > they wish to proceed. > I am prepared to be in the rough but I have a