Francis:
> => in fact the home address impersonation attack exists only in the mobile
> node - home agent case, not in the mobile node - correspondent case. If a
> node can use the address of another node to communicate with the
> correspondent, establish some security association, etc, this is an
Hi Francis,
Thanks for the review.
Francis Dupont wrote:
Comments: some editorial questions:
- in abstract page 1: s/header/Header/
BTW as MH is the common abbrev Mobility Header should always get the 'H'.
This is not clear for Mobility Option but a choice has to be done and
applied.
In your previous mail you wrote:
=> I reply here because there is a common misconception in this comment.
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
An important requirement for IPsec-based protection of Mobile IPv6 route
optimization is that the IPsec security a
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-mip6
