Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of

Thanks so much for your comments! We will discuss with document shepherd / AD & post a new draft. Nalini (on behalf of the co-authors) From: jouni korhonen To: General Area Review Team ; draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option@ietf.org Sent:

Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC Gen-ART review of draft-harkins-salted-eap-pwd-06

Daniel Harkins writes: > We may be talking past each other. But the reason that note is there > is because this is a "balanced" PAKE where both sides use an identical > representation of a credential. In this case, the credential is not > the password, it's the

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ddos-protection-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please