Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-08

Thanks Janos. I will take a look at it promptly. Yours, Joel On 2/6/19 5:17 PM, János Farkas wrote: Hi Joel, Thank you very much again for your review! The draft had multiple updates since v08 you reviewed. The latest revision is v 11:

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24

Pete, thank you for your reviews of this document. Dino, thank you for addressing Pete’s comment. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Feb 5, 2019, at 9:43 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: > > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-03

Erik, thanks for your review. I entered a DISCUSS position to ask an IPR question and pointed to your review. Alissa > On Nov 13, 2018, at 11:53 PM, Erik Kline wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 20:23, Dale R. Worley > wrote: >> >> Erik Kline writes: >>>

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08

On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 06:39, Barry Leiba wrote: > > > > [3] Naive question: do we want a statement about reserving/agreeing to > > > never > > > allocate "example" in the .well-known space? > > > > Good question! I'm neutral on this; does anyone have strong feelings? > > I wouldn't say my

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-11

Hi Alissa, Thanks for your ballot. I will incorporate the due updates as part of the IESG update in version 12. Thanks. Young -Original Message- From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:ali...@cooperw.in] Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 1:24 PM To: Leeyoung ; Elwyn Davies Cc: gen-art@ietf.org;

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08

> > [3] Naive question: do we want a statement about reserving/agreeing to never > > allocate "example" in the .well-known space? > > Good question! I'm neutral on this; does anyone have strong feelings? I wouldn't say my feelings are strong, but I think it's unnecessary. The reason we have IP

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08

On 06.02.2019 08:21, Mark Nottingham wrote: Hi Erik! On 6 Feb 2019, at 6:10 pm, Erik Kline wrote: Nits/editorial comments: [1] I assume the URIs in 6.3 are also meant to be deleted upon publication? Not all of them; just the ones referenced from the section that's marked for deletion.