Thanks
Brian
On 04-Mar-20 15:06, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> I put this in an RFC Editor note.
> Alissa
>
>> On Feb 24, 2020, at 11:04 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Brian,
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2020, at 17:01, Brian Carpenter via Datatracker wrote:
>>> Is this draft intended to become
I put this in an RFC Editor note.
Alissa
> On Feb 24, 2020, at 11:04 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
> Thanks Brian,
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2020, at 17:01, Brian Carpenter via Datatracker wrote:
>> Is this draft intended to become part of BCP25? I think it would be
>> useful for the IESG to clarify
Vijay, thanks for your reviews. Authors, thanks for your responses. I entered a
No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Feb 25, 2020, at 1:00 AM, Roni Even (A) wrote:
>
> Vijay thanks,
> The document will be published as an Informational RFC and not a proposed
> standard.
> Roni
>
>>
Ines, thanks for your review. Carlos, thanks for your response. I entered a No
Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Nov 2, 2019, at 7:44 AM, CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ines,
>
> We've just posted a new revision addressing your comments.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carlos
>
> On Fri, Oct
Paul, thanks for your review. Carlos, thanks for your response. I entered a No
Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Nov 1, 2019, at 8:06 AM, CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO
> wrote:
>
> Dear Paul,
>
> We've just posted a new revision (-14) addressing all your comments.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Carlos
>
>
Robert, thanks for the careful (as always) review.
Just on one point -- the authors can reply to the others:
> It doesn't look like application/jscalendar+json has had a media type review.
There aren't formal media-type reviews for types registered in
IETF-consensus documents: see Section 3.1
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Dale, thanks for your reviews. Sean, thanks for your responses. I entered a No
Objection ballot. If Dale’s questions can be clarified for non-expert readers,
I think that would be good.
Alissa
> On Mar 1, 2020, at 11:00 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>
> Looking at
Gyan, thanks for your review. Ziaoqing, thanks for your responses. I entered a
No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Feb 27, 2020, at 12:36 PM, Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)
> wrote:
>
> Hi Gyan,
>
> Thanks a lot for your very thorough review of this draft, and for your
> valuable comments. We have
Joel, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Feb 13, 2020, at 7:44 PM, Joel Halpern via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART)
Russ, thanks for your review. Tal, thanks for addressing Russ’ review. I
entered a No Objection ballot.
Best,
Alissa
> On Feb 16, 2020, at 9:20 AM, Tal Mizrahi wrote:
>
> Hi Russ,
>
> Many thanks for the thorough review.
>
> Please see the proposed changes below and let us know if they
Mohit, thanks for your reviews. Brian, thanks for your response. I entered a
Yes ballot. Glad to finally see this getting done!
Alissa
> On Feb 27, 2020, at 10:44 PM, Mohit Sethi via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Mohit Sethi
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART
12 matches
Mail list logo
