Hi Robert,
Thank you very much for your time and valuable comments.
My answers/explanations are inline below with prefix [HC].
Your comments have been addressed in the updated document
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling/
Best Regards,
Peter,
Thank you for the explanation.
Linda
-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 3:40 AM
To: Linda Dunbar ; Acee Lindem (acee)
; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse@ietf.org;
l...@ietf.org
Subject: Re:
Robbie Harwood writes:
> Russ Housley writes:
>> On May 28, 2020, at 6:27 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>>> Russ Housley via Datatracker writes:
>>>
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Dear Elwyn,
One quick comment about:
> s7: This is an informational document and, as such, cannot have
> normative
> references. Please combine all references into one refererences
> section.
If we refer to the IESG statement available at:
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Linda,
On 09/06/2020 22:20, Linda Dunbar wrote:
Peter,
Thank you for the explanation.
So you are saying that a node might not support RSVP or RSVP-TE, but can
advertise the TE related attributes for SR purpose. When the head node
receiving the advertisement also support RSVP-TE, it might
