Sorry, trying to get through backlog. Took longer than expected...
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:04:53AM +0100, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> Hi.
> It has been about 6 weeks since responses to the review were postponed till
> after IETF 101 any thoughts yet?
> Regards,Elwyn
>
>
> Sent from Samsung tablet.
> Original message From: Elwyn Davies
> Date: 02/03/2018 12:04 (GMT+00:00) To: Brian E Carpenter
> , gen-art@ietf.org Cc:
> draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art]
> Gen-art LC Review of
> draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-13
> Just taking up one point for the time being
> Even if the reference model is informational, I was relying on RFC 8067, s1,
> para 3:
> Section 2 of [RFC3967] lists some conditions under which downrefs may
> make sense. In addition to those, it has become common for working
> groups to produce foundational documents (which contain important
> information such as terminology definitions and architectural design
> and considerations) at Informational status, and those documents are
> often needed as normative references in the Standards Track protocol
> documents that follow.
> I would say that sombody implementing ACP really needs to have read and
> understood the reference model and so I would argue:1. That it needs to be
> normative,and2. The downref is sanctioned by the language in RFC 8067.
> I am on holiday for a week and others are fighting the draft deadline so
> perhaps we can postpone discussion of the other points until the draft panic
> has subsided.
> Cheers,Elwyn
> Sent from Samsung tablet.
--
---
t...@cs.fau.de
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art