Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03
Paul, thanks for your review. Les, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Dec 9, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > wrote: > > Paul - > > Thanx for the careful review and the kind words. > > Les > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Paul Kyzivat >> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2018 12:06 PM >> To: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis@ietf.org >> Cc: General Area Review Team >> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03 >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the >> IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other >> last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03 >> Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat >> Review Date: 2018-12-09 >> IETF LC End Date: 2018-12-12 >> IESG Telechat date: ? >> >> Summary: >> >> This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC. >> >> Issues: None >> >> It was very easy to review this document because a diff with RFC7810 >> showed me everything of note, and this was consistent with Appendix A. >> >> Changing an RFC in a way that is not backwards compatible is >> problematic, but the authors have clearly considered the issues and find >> this the best of bad alternatives. >> >> The reference to draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-14 is now out of date. I'm not >> raising it as a nit because chasing references to drafts is futile and >> this will be fixed by the editor. > ___ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03
Paul - Thanx for the careful review and the kind words. Les > -Original Message- > From: Paul Kyzivat > Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2018 12:06 PM > To: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis@ietf.org > Cc: General Area Review Team > Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other > last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03 > Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat > Review Date: 2018-12-09 > IETF LC End Date: 2018-12-12 > IESG Telechat date: ? > > Summary: > > This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC. > > Issues: None > > It was very easy to review this document because a diff with RFC7810 > showed me everything of note, and this was consistent with Appendix A. > > Changing an RFC in a way that is not backwards compatible is > problematic, but the authors have clearly considered the issues and find > this the best of bad alternatives. > > The reference to draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-14 is now out of date. I'm not > raising it as a nit because chasing references to drafts is futile and > this will be fixed by the editor. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03 Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat Review Date: 2018-12-09 IETF LC End Date: 2018-12-12 IESG Telechat date: ? Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC. Issues: None It was very easy to review this document because a diff with RFC7810 showed me everything of note, and this was consistent with Appendix A. Changing an RFC in a way that is not backwards compatible is problematic, but the authors have clearly considered the issues and find this the best of bad alternatives. The reference to draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-14 is now out of date. I'm not raising it as a nit because chasing references to drafts is futile and this will be fixed by the editor. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
