Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

I wrote: On 29.01.18 23:07, Eliot Lear wrote: > > The line in question is as follows: > >   This includes, >   but is not limited to, native and unmodified IPv4 and IPv6 >   connectivity, global reachability, and no additional limitation >   that would materially impact their

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

Hi Alissa, On 30.01.18 16:54, Alissa Cooper wrote: >>> 'It is anticipated that >>> those roles will evolve. The IASA MUST keep the >>> community informed in this regard, and MAY do so without updating >>> this memo.' >> I don't think the MUST significantly changes the meaning, so I'm

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

Ok.  I'll push an update based on these changes in the next few days, barring additional comments. On 30.01.18 17:02, Dan Romascanu wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Alissa Cooper > wrote: > > > > On Jan 29, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Pete

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote: > > > On Jan 29, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Pete Resnick > wrote: > > > > > >> 8. Section 4: > >> > >> 'It is anticipated that > >> those roles will evolve. The IASA is responsible for keeping the > >>

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

> On Jan 29, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: > > >> 8. Section 4: >> >> 'It is anticipated that >> those roles will evolve. The IASA is responsible for keeping the >> community informed in this regard, and MAY do so without updating >> this memo.' >>

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

Hi Pete and thanks Dan for the review.  Please see below. On 29.01.18 19:12, Pete Resnick wrote: > Dan, > > Thanks so much for the thorough review. I'll try to get each of these > into the issues list. Comments inline: > > On 24 Jan 2018, at 11:46, Dan Romascanu wrote: > >> Reviewer: Dan

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

Hi Pete, Thanks for your answers and for addressing my concerns. Here are a few answers to your returned questions: On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: > > > - 'where the IETF guest room >> allocations are negotiated' - do we mean to say 'where

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

Dan, Thanks so much for the thorough review. I'll try to get each of these into the issues list. Comments inline: On 24 Jan 2018, at 11:46, Dan Romascanu wrote: Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For