Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-sec-threats-03

2017-01-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Many thanks Elwyn for your detailed review. I also found the discussion afterwards enlightening. I’m expecting the authors to draw some conclusions re: possible modifications based on the questions and answers. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-sec-threats-03

2016-12-20 Thread Elwyn Davies
Right, it is always up to the authors (subject to wg consensus)... but it certainly helps me understand - so many thanks for that.  Cheers,Elwyn Sent from Samsung tablet. Original message From: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" Date: 20/12/2016

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-sec-threats-03

2016-12-20 Thread Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Elwyn I was just commenting as an author of most of the RFCs referred to - but not this one. So that’s down to the authors of this one to accept, adjust or whatever. But in my personal capacity, I think a comment on packet ICVs would not go amiss - but it needs to get its layering right.

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-sec-threats-03

2016-12-20 Thread Elwyn Davies
Hi. Thanks, Christopher. So, I think the situation can be clarified - and would have provided a clearer answer to my question by 1.  adding a couple of sentences to s6.2 to point up the alternative packet and message protections; and 2. explaining in s6.2.1 that that the 'hole' in the

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-sec-threats-03

2016-12-19 Thread Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Elwyn Davies > s3.2:  I do not know enough about the details of NHDP and OLSRv2 to know if > this is a silly question:  Would it be possible for a compromised node to > perform hop-limit or hop-count modification attacks even with RFC 6183 > security in place just by modifying these fields and

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-sec-threats-03

2016-12-18 Thread Elwyn Davies
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more