Many thanks for your review, Pete.
I have balloted no-objection for this document in today’s IESG telechat.
Authors, please note Pete’s editorial suggestion.
Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art maili
Orit & Yoav, thanks much for the review and edits. I have balloted no-obj for
this document for the tonight’s IESG telechat.
Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://w
Elwyn, Christer — many thanks!
Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Peter,
Thanks for the review and the summary. And thanks Dino for addressing most of
the issues. I have raised some of the few remaining issues in my IESG review.
Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art
I guess I did mention this before but just in case that was missed - the idea
of a separate confidentiality mechanism for each encapsulation/overlay protocol
when these are all IP based does seem a bit inapposite to me. At a minimum, it
opens up scope for additional security holes to prey upon (
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Manish Kumar wrote:
> I guess I did mention this before but just in case that was missed - the
> idea of a separate confidentiality mechanism for each encapsulation/overlay
> protocol when these are all IP based does seem a bit inapposite to me. At a
> minimum, it
Hi all,
The following reviewers have assignments:
Reviewer LC end Draft
-
Joel Halpern 2016-11-04 draft-bbf-bbf-urn-02
Jouni Korhonen2016-10-24
draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-e
