Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
My ballots will be sparse this week as I have an all-day company meeting today
and the IAOC retreat Tues-Weds. I will not be filling in positions on any
documents on which I do not ballot before the telechat.
Alissa
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 8:44 PM, IESG Secretary wrote:
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a
Meral, thanks for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Feb 23, 2018, at 12:06 AM, Meral Shirazipour
> wrote:
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents
Thanks again for the review. Comments inline.
On 03/30/2018 04:45 AM, Dale Worley wrote:
> Reviewer: Dale Worley
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
> the
> iff i can select which community's or communities' values form the sampling
> bucket(s), this seems reasonable. if i am community transparent, i probably
> don't want a bucket for each community on my inbound set.
Yes, this sounds better. It can be achieved by configuring the intermediate
Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 12:32:49PM -0400, Joel M. Halpern:
> (the authors would not have written it if no one wanted it.)
eh, that might not be a valid argument :)
> Also, one of the arguments for doing this in the router is that you can
> get more timely and precise correlation. Except that for