Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-05

2018-11-05 Thread Vijay Gurbani
Dear Marianne: Thank you for attending to my comments. I am fine with the text you added for S1.3. Regarding "secase" and "regstate" being existing parameters, ok. However, since the I-D is defining the "orig-cdiv" parameter, I still think it makes sense to mention this before S4. You already

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-05

2018-11-05 Thread marianne.mohali
Hi all, Thanks Vijay for the GenArt review. I've just submitted a v-06 to address your comments and here is my feedbacks: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter/ >Minor: > >- S1.3: I am not sure I follow the logic in the problem statement. Who > is the

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-05

2018-11-05 Thread marianne.mohali
Thanks Vijay for your last feedback. I’m fine with your proposal and have updated the I-D accordingly (v-07): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter/ BR, Marianne De : Vijay Gurbani [mailto:vijay.gurb...@gmail.com] Envoyé : lundi 5 novembre 2018 17:45 À 

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-05

2018-11-05 Thread marianne.mohali
Dear Vijay, Actually, the « originating » is not qualifying something by itself in this sentence, it has to be understood as a global wording for the new defined session case which is "originating after CDIV" which is different for an “originating call leg”. If you don’t mind, I would prefer

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-05

2018-11-05 Thread Vijay Gurbani
Dear Marianne: Thank you, again, for attending to my comment. Note that you still have a dangling verb "originating" in the sentence. The verb is not qualifying anything: For this use case, this document creates a new parameter ("orig-cdiv") for the originating after CDIV session case to

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-05

2018-11-05 Thread Vijay Gurbani
Dear Marianne: OK, if the context of "originating after CDIV" is well understood by the folks working in this area, then I am fine with leaving it as is. Thanks. - vijay On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:51 AM wrote: > Dear Vijay, > > > > Actually, the « originating » is not qualifying something by

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-05

2018-11-05 Thread Ben Campbell
Editorial comment: Since “originating after CDIV” is effectively used as a compound adjective, it would be better to hyphenate it, as in “originating-after-CDIV session”. That might also make it less confusing to people unfamiliar with the terminology. (Such a change can wait to be handled

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-05

2018-11-05 Thread marianne.mohali
Ok no problem, I keep it in mind for a further update of the I-D. Marianne -Message d'origine- De : Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com] Envoyé : mardi 6 novembre 2018 02:18 À : MOHALI Marianne TGI/OLN Cc : gen-art@ietf.org; sipc...@ietf.org; IETF list; Vijay Gurbani;