> IMHO we just drop the “update 6833bis” and we are fine.
I agree.
Dino
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
What does fixing in (1) mean?
Dino
> On Dec 19, 2018, at 3:51 AM,
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Brian, whether to maintain the document standalone was discussed by the WG.
> You may refer, for example, to the message from Deborah which clarifies this
> point:
Hello, Robert! Thanks for your review.
Your comments prompted one more read-through of the draft, with specific
attention to your points, both to be more specific with actors and to refine
the 2119 keywords. Karen O'Donoghue has been very helpful in helping us sort
this out, and you can expect
Hi Francesca,
Thank you very much for your review.
Please see in-line how we are resolving your comments in the next revision (07,
to be published asap).
Thanks.
Jorge
-Original Message-
From: BESS on behalf of Francesca Palombini
Date: Friday, December 14, 2018 at 5:13 PM
To:
Hi all,
Brian, whether to maintain the document standalone was discussed by the WG. You
may refer, for example, to the message from Deborah which clarifies this point:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/current/msg07886.html. One of the
outcomes of that discussion is to add an
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Thanks for the review, Russ. Comments below (nothing major); pull request
here for your review:
https://github.com/ietf/perc-wg/pull/163
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 4:24 AM Russ Housley wrote:
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
Hi Dino,
OLD:
Values in the "Not Assigned" range can be assigned according to
procedures in [RFC8126].
NEW:
Values in the "Not Assigned" range can be assigned via Standards
Action [RFC8113].
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dino Farinacci
10 matches
Mail list logo
