Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-6lo-btle-13 (completed)

Hi Elwyn, Sorry for the lack of feedback from our side during these days. We are finalizing a draft update which (hopefully) incorporates all your suggestions, as well as other comments that we have received. By the way, thank you very much for your thorough review. We believe it has helped a

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-08

Dear Peter, Thanks a lot for your helpful review. We plan to incorporate your suggestions in the next revision of the draft. Best regards, Carles > Reviewer: Peter Yee > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team

Re: [Gen-art] [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-03

Dear Dale, Thanks for reviewing draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-03. Authors of draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time recently produced revision -04 of the draft, based on a number of comments received, including yours: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time/ Do you think -04

Re: [Gen-art] [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-08

Hi Pete, Thanks a lot for your review of the draft! We just submitted -09, which aims at addressing the last round of review comments, including yours: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-09 https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-09 Please find below our inline

Re: [Gen-art] [Lwip] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-10

Hi Alissa, and Linda, Thank you very much for your reviews! Based on Alissa's message, we understand that no update is required regarding Linda's comments. Thanks, Carles (on behalf of the authors) > Linda, thanks for your review. I think on both points you raise what the > document proposes