Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02

2016-10-04 Thread Elwyn Davies
gt; Cc: draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update....@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org Subject: RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02 Hi,   I submitted a new version (-05) of the draft, with the new title.   Regards,   Christer   From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com]

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02

2016-10-04 Thread Christer Holmberg
ubject: RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02 Hi, >I was just having a look at the updated draft - the changes are fine AFAICS. > >However, looking at it again, I think a more informative title would not go >>amiss. How about: > > Clarifications to SD

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02

2016-10-04 Thread Christer Holmberg
;> Date: 16/09/2016 23:45 (GMT+00:00) To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmb...@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com>> Cc: draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update@ietf.org>, gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org> Subject:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02

2016-10-04 Thread Elwyn Davies
Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02 Hi Christer. Thanks.  That's fine. Cheers,Elwyn Sent from Samsung tablet.___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02

2016-09-16 Thread Elwyn Davies
...@ietf.org Subject: RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02 Hi Elwyn,   Thanks for your review! Please see inline. Nits/editorial comments:   >s3.1: It is a bit pedantic, but 'to be sure, to be sure', add new first line: >   In the rest of this section references t