Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-campbell-sip-messaging-smime-03

2018-10-25 Thread Alissa Cooper
Peter, thanks for your review. Ben, thanks for following up. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Oct 10, 2018, at 6:11 AM, Ben Campbell wrote: > > > >> On Oct 9, 2018, at 10:50 PM, Peter Yee wrote: >> >> Ben, >> >> Regarding the metadata, it would seem to that these

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-campbell-sip-messaging-smime-03

2018-10-09 Thread Ben Campbell
> On Oct 9, 2018, at 10:50 PM, Peter Yee wrote: > > Ben, > > Regarding the metadata, it would seem to that these intermediaries > would be inserting this metadata regardless of whether S/MIME was used or > not. As the intermediaries can't read the S/MIME messages (assuming >

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-campbell-sip-messaging-smime-03

2018-10-09 Thread Peter Yee
Ben, Regarding the metadata, it would seem to that these intermediaries would be inserting this metadata regardless of whether S/MIME was used or not. As the intermediaries can't read the S/MIME messages (assuming encryption), they aren't revealing anything that the sender could have

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-campbell-sip-messaging-smime-03

2018-10-09 Thread Ben Campbell
Hi Peter, thanks for your review. Please see inline: Ben. > On Oct 8, 2018, at 9:57 PM, Peter Yee wrote: > > Reviewer: Peter Yee > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being