Ok no problem, I keep it in mind for a further update of the I-D.
Marianne
-Message d'origine-
De : Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
Envoyé : mardi 6 novembre 2018 02:18
À : MOHALI Marianne TGI/OLN
Cc : gen-art@ietf.org; sipc...@ietf.org; IETF list; Vijay Gurbani;
Editorial comment:
Since “originating after CDIV” is effectively used as a compound adjective, it
would be better to hyphenate it, as in “originating-after-CDIV session”. That
might also make it less confusing to people unfamiliar with the terminology.
(Such a change can wait to be handled
Dear Marianne: OK, if the context of "originating after CDIV" is well
understood by the folks working in this area, then I am fine with leaving
it as is.
Thanks.
- vijay
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:51 AM wrote:
> Dear Vijay,
>
>
>
> Actually, the « originating » is not qualifying something by
Dear Vijay,
Actually, the « originating » is not qualifying something by itself in this
sentence, it has to be understood as a global wording for the new defined
session case which is "originating after CDIV" which is different for an
“originating call leg”.
If you don’t mind, I would prefer
Dear Marianne: Thank you, again, for attending to my comment.
Note that you still have a dangling verb "originating" in the sentence.
The verb is not qualifying anything:
For this use case, this document creates a new parameter ("orig-cdiv")
for
the originating after CDIV session case to
Thanks Vijay for your last feedback. I’m fine with your proposal and have
updated the I-D accordingly (v-07):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter/
BR,
Marianne
De : Vijay Gurbani [mailto:vijay.gurb...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : lundi 5 novembre 2018 17:45
À
Dear Marianne: Thank you for attending to my comments.
I am fine with the text you added for S1.3.
Regarding "secase" and "regstate" being existing parameters, ok. However,
since the I-D is defining the "orig-cdiv" parameter, I still think it makes
sense to mention this before S4. You already
Hi all,
Thanks Vijay for the GenArt review.
I've just submitted a v-06 to address your comments and here is my feedbacks:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter/
>Minor:
>
>- S1.3: I am not sure I follow the logic in the problem statement. Who
> is the