[Gendergap] Re: #MEMORY (WAS: Re: List update)

2021-05-16 Thread Željko Blaće
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 6:21 AM Risker wrote: > The overwhelming majority of Wikimedians work only on one or two projects. > I don't think Meta is a good place to memorialize them; in many cases, Meta > is a project they have never gone to, where they are mostly unknown, and it > is disconnected

[Gendergap] Re: #MEMORY (WAS: Re: List update)

2021-05-16 Thread LB
So sad to hear that Sarah/Slim Virgin has passed. I wish I could leave my condolences. I wasn't aware of her until she invited me to join the Gender Gap Task Force, but from then on she was someone whose take on Wikipedia and Wikipedians - including myself - was important to me. I especially

[Gendergap] Re: #MEMORY (WAS: Re: List update)

2021-05-16 Thread ciell . wikipedia
Very sorry to hear about their passing. I've been involved with handling the 'administrative side' for a few Wikimedians from the Dutch community we lost last year, and the people that handle the en-Wikipedia page saw my edits and reached out to me and asked if I could write a small in

[Gendergap] Re: #MEMORY (WAS: Re: List update)

2021-05-16 Thread J Hayes
yes. virtual memorials are fine, and we could do an editathon in her name as we did for Kevin, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/2016_Women_in_Philosophy_Drive but i think we should organize some scholarships / stipends in her name. i will raise this at Wikimedia DC