Re: New maintenance.

Sent from my iPad > On 23 Apr 2018, at 00:46, sebb wrote: > >> On 22 April 2018 at 15:53, Henk P. Penning wrote: >>> On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, j...@apache.org wrote: >>> >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:53:52 +0200 >>> From: j...@apache.org >>> To:

Re: New maintenance.

On 22 April 2018 at 15:53, Henk P. Penning wrote: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, j...@apache.org wrote: > >> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:53:52 +0200 >> From: j...@apache.org >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: New maintenance. > > >> Based on site-json I propose the following

Re: New maintenance.

On 22 April 2018 at 15:48, Jan Iversen wrote: > > >> On 22 Apr 2018, at 16:41, sebb wrote: >> >> On 22 April 2018 at 14:53, > wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> Looking at the latest emails, it seems like a compromise

Re: New maintenance.

> On 22 Apr 2018, at 16:53, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, j...@apache.org wrote: > >> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:53:52 +0200 >> From: j...@apache.org >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: New maintenance. > >> Based on site-json I propose the following

Re: New maintenance.

On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, j...@apache.org wrote: Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:53:52 +0200 From: j...@apache.org To: general@attic.apache.org Subject: New maintenance. Based on site-json I propose the following changes: Change docs/scripts/attic.js to project.json (kept as pure json outside docs).

Re: New maintenance.

> On 22 Apr 2018, at 16:41, sebb wrote: > > On 22 April 2018 at 14:53, > wrote: >> Hi >> >> Looking at the latest emails, it seems like a compromise between the 2 >> solutions are the best solution. >> >> How about if the combine

Re: New maintenance.

On 22 April 2018 at 14:53, wrote: > Hi > > Looking at the latest emails, it seems like a compromise between the 2 > solutions are the best solution. > > How about if the combine the proposals to the following (that would make my > life easier, and hopefully satisfy the