Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] root collation vs unicode collation in terms of performance

2016-08-23 Thread Mary Holstege
2:31 PM > To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <mailto:general@developer.marklogic.com> > > Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] root collation vs unicode collation in > terms of performance > > > Hi, > > > > In one of older developer community threads here > <

Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] root collation vs unicode collation in terms of performance

2016-08-23 Thread Christopher Hamlin
* general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com [mailto:general-bounces@ > developer.marklogic.com] *On Behalf Of *Yalaverthi, Sudheer (LNG-RDU) > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 23, 2016 11:27 AM > *To:* MarkLogic Developer Discussion > *Subject:* Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] root collation vs unicod

Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] root collation vs unicode collation in terms of performance

2016-08-23 Thread Tim Meagher
, 2016 11:27 AM To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] root collation vs unicode collation in terms of performance Hi, If anyone can share their experiences or knowledge in terms of which one works better in terms of performance, it will be very helpful

Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] root collation vs unicode collation in terms of performance

2016-08-23 Thread Yalaverthi, Sudheer (LNG-RDU)
-RDU) Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 2:31 PM To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] root collation vs unicode collation in terms of performance Hi, In one of older developer community threads here<http://developer.marklogic.com/pipermail/general/2012-March/009981.h

[MarkLogic Dev General] root collation vs unicode collation in terms of performance

2016-08-22 Thread Yalaverthi, Sudheer (LNG-RDU)
Hi, In one of older developer community threads here, I have found this statement from Mary. "If you are not collapsing values, the codepoint collation is generally about 10% faster in its operations." We have few elem