Re: [Jgeneral] x. y. documentation

phrases was never considered part of the formal documentation and is out of date in a few respects. It would be a worthwhile exercise to get this updated. Most other uses of x. and y. should be fixed, though I just see one more in the user docs. On 3 February 2016 at 13:02, Raul Miller

Re: [Jgeneral] x. y. documentation

related, could we change profile definition bind 2 : 'x@(y"_)' to bind =: 2 : 'u@(v"_)' - Original Message - From: chris burke To: General forum Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:02 PM Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] x. y. documentation

[Jgeneral] x. y. documentation

http://www.jsoftware.com/help/phrases/gerunds.htm has a line which yields a spelling error in j804: a5=: sel=: 1 : '] #~ ] x. {.' Personally, I think I would have insisted that 9!:48'' default to 1 until the documentation had been changed. But I guess that's just me... -- Raul

Re: [Jgeneral] x. y. documentation

> related, could we change profile definition Do you have examples where this makes a difference? On 3 February 2016 at 14:11, 'Pascal Jasmin' via General < gene...@jsoftware.com> wrote: > related, could we change profile definition > > bind > 2 : 'x@(y"_)' > > to > > > bind =: 2 : 'u@(v"_)' >

Re: [Jgeneral] x. y. documentation

Unless there is something weird I don't understand, there should be no difference. I was suggesting it as a way to purge older style permitted code that would tend to just confuse anyone that wasn't around then. - Original Message - From: chris burke To: