BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-04-05 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 3 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module icu4j failed [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project icu4j (in module icu4j) failed [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project uddi4j (in module uddi4j) fa

gump3 and Maven

2005-04-05 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, I was reminded of Gump and Maven metadata this morning, and with all the gump3 activity thought I would check in. I haven't been completely across the gump3 plans, but was wondering what plans there are for a couple of things: - using Maven IDs. Last Leo and I said on this was... http://mail

Fw: [Gump Wiki] Update of "GumpThree" by LeoSimons

2005-04-05 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
This came to the Gump mailing list, but says it is going to itself. Is this something we need to configure on our wiki? [My e-mail tool didn't put this into my Gump list for this reason.] regards Adam - Original Message - From: "Apache Wiki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Apache Wiki" <[EMAIL

[Gump Wiki] Update of "GumpThree" by LeoSimons

2005-04-05 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Gump Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by LeoSimons: http://wiki.apache.org/gump/GumpThree The comment on the change is: instructions in windows/cygwin with Gump3 branch New page: Gump3 is

Need testers for gump3 branch + windows

2005-04-05 Thread Leo Simons
Hi gang, I just committed some updates to the gump3 branch that "on my machine", allow me to run on cygwin+winxp+python2.4-win32. Could some people try and follow http://wiki.apache.org/gump/GumpThree And let me know where it breaks? Cheers, Leo -

Re: Walking around gump code (svn commit: r160101...)

2005-04-05 Thread Leo Simons
On 05-04-2005 15:16, "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Quick Q: how do you find the location to make small changes like this when >> you fire up your development environment, and how do you test to make sure >> its the only thing to change? > > In this case, I guess I believed I knew

FW: Walking around gump code (svn commit: r160101...)

2005-04-05 Thread Leo Simons
Wrong list! :-D -- Forwarded Message From: Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:11:26 +0200 To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Walking around gump code (svn commit: r160101...) Adam, Quick Q: how do you find the location to make small changes l

Re: Walking around gump code (svn commit: r160101...)

2005-04-05 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> Quick Q: how do you find the location to make small changes like this when > you fire up your development environment, and how do you test to make sure > its the only thing to change? In this case, I guess I believed I knew it, based on prior knowledge of the code, i.e that all things to do with

Re: Nag messages late

2005-04-05 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005, Elliotte Rusty Harold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good, but why did I get no nag e-mails for the two+ weeks it was > failing? Because Gump didn't even try to build XOM. Projects that XOM relies on didn't build. > It looks like there may be a glitch in the system somewhere.

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-04-05 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 13 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module asm success, but with warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module xdoclet success, but with warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module icu4j

Nag messages late

2005-04-05 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
I just got a nag message about XOM. Seems the build failed. Looking at the failure message, I think I understand why. It looks like something I fixed a day or two ago. Looking at http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/xom/ the build seems to be succeeding again. Good, but why did I get no nag e-m