xml-fop: Can't figure out why it fails

2010-06-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public-jars/xmlgraphics-commons/jars/ [3] http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/xml-fop/xml-fop/gump_work/build_xml-fop_xml-fop.html [4] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=954512view=rev Thanks! Jeremias Maerki

Re: xml-fop: Can't figure out why it fails

2010-06-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Wonderful. Thanks for your feedback, Stefan! On 21.06.2010 12:08:07 Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2010-06-21, Jeremias Maerki wrote: It appears as if Gump didn't SVN update the workspace properly and the changes [4] I made to FOP Trunk to adjust for the move are not visible to Gump. You

Re: commons-logging : unknown to *this* workspace

2009-01-08 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Thanks! On 08.01.2009 12:51:51 Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2009-01-08, Jeremias Maerki d...@jeremias-maerki.ch wrote: Hmm, I wonder why Gump thinks commons-logging and commons-io are unknown to *this* workspace. I can see those two just fine. A change to commons-proper's Gump descriptor

Re: Disabling Kaffee

2007-12-14 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Kaffe and we always run a fixed version of Kaffe this state is not going to change therefore I'd like to disable it. Any objections? Stefan Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

xml-fop-maintenance stopped working May 26

2006-05-29 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Can anyone confirm? BTW, that's weird, isn't it? http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/gump/ (404 error) vs. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/ (ok) Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

2006-02-19 Thread Jeremias Maerki
profit here. We still have to be compatible with 1.3.1 although most people work on =1.4. Gump could help a lot in early detection of mistakes. Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-fop-maintenance (in module xml-fop-maintenance) failed

2005-09-19 Thread Jeremias Maerki
(cc'ing dev@ant.apache.org) On 16.09.2005 21:23:39 Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No idea what this is suddenly about. Looks like a permission problem? No, the file simply doesn't exist. The properties directory is empty, at least

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-fop-maintenance (in module xml-fop-maintenance) failed

2005-09-16 Thread Jeremias Maerki
] Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [proposal] removing non-ASF leaves from the workspace

2004-10-31 Thread Jeremias Maerki
. WTDY? Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-fop (in module xml-fop) failed

2004-10-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
38000913102004, brutus:brutus-public:38000913102004 Gump E-mail Identifier (unique within run) #8. -- Apache Gump http://gump.apache.org/ [Instance: brutus] Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-fop (in module xml-fop) failed

2004-10-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Excellent. Thanks a lot! On 15.10.2004 10:53:30 Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems like the JUnit task doesn't pick up the test classes that were compiled beforehand. Yes, because you didn't run unit tests before, it hasn't been