Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Agreed.
I think the real challenge is at the project level, projects need to
establish naming consistent with their Umbrella group, this is a real
growing pain at this point, I suspect eventually the entire Jakarta
Commons will need to migrate to
jakarta-commons/jakarta-
Brett Porter wrote:
Yup, I think we need ASF-wide artefact ids (within group
ids). I'd like to think the community and/or communities can
come to agreement on what the values are, and if that means
defaulting to what Maven/Ibiblio already have, then so be it.
Consistency is the key more than a
I would suspect that the commons logging ant build.xml file has either
been customized beyond the capabilities of maven, or was never actually
generated from maven.
If I think about this with my Maven hat on, a discrepancy arises.
groupId: commons-logging
artifactId: commons-logging
artifactId
ase your development on the
bleeding edge (SNAPSHOT) or a stable release (x.x), not on a possibly
outdated and unstable dated or nightly build. This is what we are trying
to break away from by getting the nightlies off of ibiblio and into a
separate Repository.
-Mark
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
M
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Hey Bubba,
;-)
So I've been reviewing the project.xml files in the Jakarta Commons and
I see the gumpRepositoryId tag in them. In some its the projects name in
others its just "jakarta". Should this be set to something specific? It
seems wierd to have multiple proje
Hey Bubba,
So I've been reviewing the project.xml files in the Jakarta Commons and
I see the gumpRepositoryId tag in them. In some its the projects name in
others its just "jakarta". Should this be set to something specific? It
seems wierd to have multiple project.xml's with the same gump repos
think of it as Redhat 9.1. I'm quite happy with yum, up2date
and with the JPackage efforts, I can easily manage via rpm's the
installation of Java and many Apache Java projects with little to no
effort.
-Mark
--
Mark R. Diggory
Software Developer - VDC Project
Harvard MIT Data Center
http:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Okay, so you just mean no gump for sandbox [deletes long rant about
importance of nightly builds]. Summary of it is, that I think gump and the
apache repository need to be hooked together so each project is updating
the SNAPSHOT whenever it changes.
Nick's probably going to
