Re: Stray nags (was:Re: [VOTE RESULTS] Retire Java Gump)

2004-06-20 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Sorry for not understanding how nagging works, and perhaps the intent already exists, but shouldn't a Gump instance have a Concern Area, i.e. Nag projects that have 'these' domains in the nag-address ? And by default only use the domain-name on the host it is running. Nagging works for public

[VOTE RESULTS] Retire Java Gump

2004-06-18 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
It has been 10 days since the vote to retire Traditional Gump was put out. As I read this [VOTE] mails on this list I see seven +1s (Leo, Adam, Davanum, Martin, Nicola, Stefan, Stefano), one +0 (Michael), one -0 (the suggestion of a -1 if traditional Gumps were stopped, Sebastian). My problem is

Stray nags (was:Re: [VOTE RESULTS] Retire Java Gump)

2004-06-18 Thread Martin van den Bemt
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 15:49, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: 'CleanUp' branch (perhaps move it to SVN) or something. There is significant risk/change w/ this branch (as stray nags have shown) and it'd be a good time to rework directories, etc. Is nagging on by default ? If it is a config entry, it's

Re: Stray nags (was:Re: [VOTE RESULTS] Retire Java Gump)

2004-06-18 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Is nagging on by default ? If it is a config entry, it's probably best to have the nag only as a commandline parameter, to prevent spam in the future ? Nagging is both a command line parameter (--notify) and has to be requested/enabled in the workspace (with nag...). Unfortunately when I

Re: [VOTE RESULTS] Retire Java Gump

2004-06-18 Thread Michael Davey
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: My problem is that suggestion of a -1 ... 'cos although we won't actually stop folks running traditional Gumps, we aren't wanting to maintain two metadata trees, we aren't wanting to maintain Traditional to work on current metadata. Traditional will (with Jakarta Commons so

Re: [VOTE RESULTS] Retire Java Gump

2004-06-18 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
How about a compromise? Here is my proposal: Fork the metadata tree (perhaps putting the new one in SVN) and make it very clear that the gumpmeisters have no intention of maintaining the traditional metadata themselves (but anyone with commit priviledges may modify the traditional metadata if

Re: Stray nags (was:Re: [VOTE RESULTS] Retire Java Gump)

2004-06-18 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Just to prevent myself from spamming when I set up gump on my new box (running fc 2).. Mvgr, Martin On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 17:30, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: Is nagging on by default ? If it is a config entry, it's probably best to have the nag only as a commandline parameter, to prevent spam in