I'm halfway torn between throwing history away and simply importing
CVS HEAD manually and doing a trunk-only conversion. Well, not really
true, I'd probably prefer keeping the history, but could live without
it. What's your preference?
+1 for keep the history.
The second question is,
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since today folks (1) checkout Gump from SVN and (2) checkout
metadata from CVS into ./metadata, I don't see a hardship of having
two places. That said, will SVN allow us to do this w/o pain?
We can add an svn:external to gump/trunk
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
I'm halfway torn between throwing history away and simply importing
CVS HEAD manually and doing a trunk-only conversion. Well, not really
true, I'd probably prefer keeping the history, but could live without
it. What's your preference?
+1 for keep the history.
The
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ALWAYS KEEP HISTORY! cvs2svn does that for you anyway!
If you use it 8-)
If you don't keep it, you'll regret it, believe me. Working on time
series data mining is part of my day job!
Simply adding a
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
it looks as if most of us were leaning towards migrating to SVN now.
We now need to decide on the details.
I'm halfway torn between throwing history away and simply importing
CVS HEAD manually and doing a trunk-only conversion. Well, not really
true, I'd
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ALWAYS KEEP HISTORY! cvs2svn does that for you anyway!
If you use it 8-)
Simply adding a CVS export to svn could do, it is an option, even if
you don't like it.
Stefan
