Re: mx4j in gump

2006-11-16 Thread Sander Temme
On Nov 16, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: I do not understand why mx4j keeps failing. Apparently we still can't see the fix. The fix of Simon is visible here : http://mx4j.cvs.sourceforge.net/mx4j/mx4j/build/build.xml? revision=1.115view=markup Is the source code that we

build of mx4j in gump

2006-11-15 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Can someone try to fix this ? Regards, Antoine [1] http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/mx4j/gump_work/update_mx4j.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: build of mx4j in gump

2006-11-15 Thread Sander Temme
Hm... On Nov 15, 2006, at 6:33 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, Simon Bordet has updated the source code of mx4j so that there are no build errors, but the CVS update on vmgump [1] does not work: Command Line cvs -q -z3 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/ mx4j update -P

Re: build of mx4j in gump

2006-11-15 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Datum: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:29:26 -0800 Von: Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Gump code and data general@gump.apache.org Betreff: Re: build of mx4j in gump Hm... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: build of mx4j in gump

2006-11-15 Thread Sander Temme
On Nov 15, 2006, at 12:59 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Simon Bordet wrote me that he fixed it. He did change the build.xml 8 hours ago. http://mx4j.cvs.sourceforge.net/mx4j/mx4j/build/build.xml?view=log so maybe vmgump should be repaired too so that the mx4j update can happen. My wc

Re: build of mx4j in gump

2006-11-15 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Sander Temme wrote: I don't have rights on vmgump, so I can't help you there. we should fix that. thoughts anybody? -- Stefano. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: build of mx4j in gump

2006-11-15 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Sander, Simon Bordet wrote me that he fixed it. He did change the build.xml 8 hours ago. http://mx4j.cvs.sourceforge.net/mx4j/mx4j/build/build.xml?view=log There is a delay between a change happening in committer

Re: [Mx4j-devel] MX4J and Gump (and another log4j deprecation effect)

2004-05-25 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 15:23, Bordet, Simone wrote: The only thing I'd prefer to avoid is to make our build running against the latest CVS (which are usually unstable), since this is gump's job. You should build and release against the latest stable Log4J, no doubt. If Log4J removed

Re: [Mx4j-devel] MX4J and Gump (and another log4j deprecation effect)

2004-05-25 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
From time to time we get an email similar to this one, and we try to promptly fix the build. Thanks, that is aprpeciated, so mind if automate that? This entry will do it. nag from=Simone Bordet lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; to=[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ I am in a busy period now, but

MX4J and Gump (and another log4j deprecation effect)

2004-05-24 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
/gump/mx4j/mx4j/index.html Recently your entry started failing, and I'm writing to inform you of this (and ask if you'd like ongoing notifications). Would you mind if we send notification mails (when builds start failing) to this list? We can pick what address the mails appear to come from. BTW