Just quickly before I leave for the day... But Stefan reminded me.
I'm planning to take a look at this in the coming week - but I was wondering
what the best approach is.
There is already a goal that will produce a maven installation using Maven -
is this enough for gump, or does Maven need to
bodewig 2004/04/08 00:17:29
Modified:project eyebrowse.xml
Log:
Some path fixes
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +2 -2 gump/project/eyebrowse.xml
Index: eyebrowse.xml
===
RCS file:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I've gotten myself on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cool.
because I'm interested in that anyway, so I won't cross-post to gump
again :)
OK, last cross-post so that people interested in that issue know to
join [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I didn't
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Stefan Bodewig (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 1:33 AM
Changes:
assignee changed from Gump Development Team
description changed from Coccondev does not seem to be pickup up the
nicolaken2004/04/08 05:07:13
Modified:.PC103.xml
Log:
It's a long waaay
to Tipperar
It's a long waaay
to Gmp
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +35 -43gump/PC103.xml
Index: PC103.xml
nicolaken2004/04/08 05:08:31
Modified:profile minimal-profile.xml
Log:
Remove Forrest and antidote from the reasonably minimal profile
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +0 -2 gump/profile/minimal-profile.xml
Index: minimal-profile.xml
nicolaken2004/04/08 05:30:27
gump/bin - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'll call for a vote on the draft from
http://wiki.apache.org/gump/Drafts/ProjectBylaws early next week so
that we have a chance to finalize this step in time for the board
meeting on 21 Apr.
If you have any comments, wish to change anything, please go ahead and
modify the draft - or discuss
Message:
The following issue has been re-assigned.
Assignee: Stefan Bodewig (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Assigner: Adam Jack (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 7:20 AM
Comment:
Ought be fixed, please review on next run (or run on brutus or something) and close
Message:
The following issue has been re-assigned.
Assignee: Adam Jack (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUMP-3
Here is an overview of the issue:
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Adam Jack
Created: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 7:56 AM
Body:
First, I believe this was (is) in place for build (in Python Gump)
it is just 'update' that fails to respect this.
Second, I don't beleive there are any module level steps
Ok, I wondered if it was the component change. Q: Is Blocker some high
priority, it sure looks it.
Ah yes, it is all coming back to me. Nick and I used to run into this all
the time. We'd run 'personal gumps' (at work, etc.) and not want to build
the full OSS stack, but still be able to refer to
Headsup...
regards
Adam
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 12:11 PM
Subject: cvs commit: gump/python/gump/test utils.py
ajack 2004/04/08 11:11:43
Modified:python/gump/syndication rss.py atom.py
I've been wondering if we ought ask for the maven gump goal to be updated to
use maven (instead or ant) and/or [for short term] use both. For both, I
was thinking of something like:
project name=X-maven ...
...
maven...
project name=X ...
...
Leo Simons wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
If you have any comments, wish to change anything, please go ahead and
modify the draft - or discuss stuff here.
I like!
Umm .. that's a worry!
;-)
--
||
| Magic by Merlin
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
4) The 'root cause/resolution' for outage X/Y (between too parties) was Z.
Log it/Blog it...
++1
If this was available I would definitely use it to post details about
what is going on relative to the projects I'm associated with.
Furthermore - it would provide an extra
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Ok, whilst sitting in the dentist's waiting room I was able to read these.
FWIIW: I can now attest that reading bylaws is more fun than having root
canal work. I won't say how much. ;-)
:-)
The only reason I raise this is that 'active committers' can have binding
vetoes,
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
4) The 'root cause/resolution' for outage X/Y (between too parties)
was Z.
Log it/Blog it...
++1
If this was available I would definitely use it to post details about
what is going on relative to the projects I'm associated with.
Furthermore -
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
If you have any comments, wish to change anything, please go ahead and
modify the draft - or discuss stuff here.
I agree we have a bit of an issue with the committers (and 'active
committers').
A little ambiguity is actually okay with me ;)
The only reason I raise this is
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
4) The 'root cause/resolution' for outage X/Y (between too parties)
was Z.
Log it/Blog it...
++1
If this was available I would definitely use it to post details about
what is going on relative to the projects I'm associated with.
Furthermore
Dear Gumpmeisters,
The following 9 nags should have been sent
G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: webwork/webwork failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: freemarker/freemarker failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-tapestry/ognl failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
21 matches
Mail list logo