BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-11-18 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 4 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project txt2html-task (in module jakarta-servletapi-5) success, but with warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module struts success, but

Re: cvs commit: gump/project jakarta-turbine-2.xml

2004-11-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 18 Nov 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: removed unknown deps. will only lead to Maven complaining about missing jars. Maybe we should fake those with dummy projects? Has there ever been a avalon-activation-spi project? Stefan

Re: cvs commit: gump/project jakarta-turbine-2.xml

2004-11-18 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 18 November 2004 19:19, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 18 Nov 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: removed unknown deps. will only lead to Maven complaining about missing jars. Maybe we should fake those with dummy projects? Has there ever been a avalon-activation-spi project? Yes, at

RE: cvs commit: gump/project jakarta-turbine-2.xml

2004-11-18 Thread Eric Pugh
I am going to start looking into this... I bet there is stuff we can remove. -Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 11:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit: gump/project jakarta-turbine-2.xml On 18 Nov

Re: cvs commit: gump/project excalibur.xml

2004-11-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 18 November 2004 18:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +depend project=jakarta-velocity/ +depend project=jakarta-velocity/ +depend project=jakarta-velocity/ This report by Maven is highly

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-11-18 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 1 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project excalibur-event (in module excalibur) success *** G U M P [EMAIL

Re: cvs commit: gump/project excalibur.xml

2004-11-18 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 18 November 2004 20:15, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 18 November 2004 18:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +depend project=jakarta-velocity/ +depend project=jakarta-velocity/ +depend

Re: svn commit: rev 76204 - in gump/trunk: . src/documentation test/fixture test/fixture/projects test/fixture/projects/test1 test/fixture/projects/test1/src test/fixture/projects/test1/src/conf test/

2004-11-18 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Log: Start adding a text fixture. Clean up a little. Get rid of gump.py for now as it is not used and confusing. Hmmm, instead of getting rid of it, can we just continue to improve it? I mean I spent a few days on that script, it's not perfect, sure, but it's a lot

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-11-18 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 4 notifys should have been sent [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module lenya success, but with warnings. There is something wrong. Lenya is not successful at all! -- Stefano.

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-11-18 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 4 notifys should have been sent [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module lenya success, but with warnings. There is something wrong. Lenya is not successful at all! This stems from the old days when SF.net CVS was so flaky. Basically, if we

Re: cvs commit: gump/repository groovy.xml

2004-11-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 18 Nov 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First steps towards building Groovy It won't build since I don't have collected all the dependencies yet. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

BATCH: Unable to send...

2004-11-18 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 1 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project lenya (in module lenya) failed *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: Project logging-log4j (in module logging-log4j) failed

2004-11-18 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Forgot to check in two modified files. Should be fixed now. At 07:17 AM 11/18/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL

Gump Failure

2004-11-18 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Gang, I think the following Gump failure could be related to recent Log4J changes... http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/ws-axis/ws-axis/gump_work/build_ws-axis_ws-axis.html Any input is appreciated. Cheers Niclas -- +--//---+ / http://www.bali.ac/ /

Re: Gump Failure

2004-11-18 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hi Niclas, The error is due to a silly bug in o.a.l.config.PropertySetter. It was fixed a few minutes ago, independently of your message. :-) At 04:09 PM 11/18/2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote: Gang, I think the following Gump failure could be related to recent Log4J changes...