On Thursday 21 October 2004 05:56, Eric Pugh wrote:
Okay.. Sorry for being dense but.. Where do I put this:
maven.jar.artifactID = path to Jar
For all normal cases; You don't. It is done in the maven.py script.
I am not even sure it will work for non-normal cases, and if a proper
classpath
On Thursday 21 October 2004 12:34, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
place your vote.
I don't know who is eligable for voting in Gump, but I guess it is all the ASF
committers... so here is my;
+1
--
+--//---+
/ http://www.bali.ac/
/ http://niclas.hedhman.org /
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I propose to move the gump metadata over to SVN and close down the CVS
repository.
+1
--
David Crossley
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: NoopInstrumentManager has moved incompatibly
Date: Thursday 21 October 2004 15:15
From: Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Excalibur Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Question 1; Does James run out-of-the-box on
Humm.. Okay.. But.. I am slowly getting it..
So, I ran into the same issue with the bsf.jar.. I call it bsf, but the
project is jakarta-bsf.
So, I add this:
maven basedir=bsf goal=jar
property name=maven.jar.bsf project=jakarta-bsf id=bsf.jar /
/maven
And, based on what you
On Thursday 21 October 2004 16:57, Eric Pugh wrote:
So, I add this:
property name=maven.jar.bsf project=jakarta-bsf id=bsf.jar /
property name=maven.jar.xmlrpc project=ws-xmlrpc id=xmlrpc.jar
No, the id refers to the declared id in the jar of the project (and I am not
sure what
Well actually, the real cause is likely to be that the
org.mortbay.jetty.jar puts the (sealed) javax.servlet.jar on the
Classpath: entry of it's Manifest file. That's the only way the sealed
servlet jar could get into the Gump build.
If we took out that Classpath: entry, then the problem
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Maybe when I googled for an SMTP spec I found a pre-Y2K one. I've updated
the code now. Thanks for the heads up, and please let us know if this isn't
resolved after my commit.
regards
Adam
I received the first GUMP message not tagged as spam yesterday (20 oct)
at 19:08PM
Scott Sanders wrote:
4) If they want to edit the metadata, any decent OS can mount the SVN
repo as a webdav drive.
Hmmm, no, I don't think we have autoversioning turned on for the ASF web
site. It would be a read-only mount if they did that.
I don't believe we are excluding anyone, now that svn
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Question 1; Does James run out-of-the-box on Loom?
James should run out of the box *IF* a few extra jars are added to
the deployment archive.
Loom contains
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose to move the gump metadata over to SVN and close down the
CVS repository.
+0.9
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On Thursday 21 October 2004 21:34, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Question 1; Does James run out-of-the-box on Loom?
James should run out of the box *IF* a few extra jars are
This Gump run is complete. It started at Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:01:08 (PDT) and
ended at Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:40:05 (PDT).
If I count correctly, this is many starts ago. The run after this one should
have been another /public/ run.
Anybody knows why the cron jobs have stopped?
Niclas
--
Dear Gumpmeisters,
The following 2 notifys should have been sent
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-security-tests (in module xml-security) failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project maven (in module maven) failed
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
This Gump run is complete. It started at Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:01:08 (PDT) and
ended at Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:40:05 (PDT).
If I count correctly, this is many starts ago. The run after this one should
have been another /public/ run.
Anybody knows why the cron jobs have
15 matches
Mail list logo
