Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
oops...i updated brutus.xml as ANT_OPTS is not really picked up.
Added:
sysproperty name=jikes.class.path
value=/usr/local/gump/kaffe/workspace/xml-xerces2/java/tools/resolver.jar/
Anybody against removing this and adding a dependency on
Dear Gumpmeisters,
The following 1 notifys should have been sent
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project lenya (in module lenya) failed
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The behavior is as you specified, if the build fails the first time due to a
prereq you get a notice, after that you don't until the build passes.
However, when a basic prereq like commons-lang or ant or xml parser failes,
and then fixes, it causes a storm of spam messages. On the turbine dev
My Question is: WHY is JDK1.4 succeding? Haven't found the answer yet.
-- dims
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 19:13:03 +1100, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
oops...i updated brutus.xml as ANT_OPTS is not really picked up.
Added:
As I get back into this I'd like to run the Gump unit tests. Can somebody
help me with:
F:\data\Python\gump-svn\pythonpython gump/test/pyunit.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File gump/test/pyunit.py, line 25, in ?
from gump import log
File
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
configure
environment name=CFLAGS value=-g /
arg name=c value=blah / !-- becomes -c blah --
arg name=prefix value=blah / !-- becomes --prefix=blah --
rawarg name=-shared / !-- becomes -shared --
/configure
I don't think I'd like the magic that's happening to
Stefano,
i think i poked through all the jars in JDK 1.4 and did not find
it...hence the question.
-- dims
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 12:40:03 -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
My Question is: WHY is JDK1.4 succeding? Haven't found the answer yet.
JDK 1.4
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Stefano,
i think i poked through all the jars in JDK 1.4 and did not find
it...hence the question.
Found it!!!
The problem is in the XJavac task that Xerces2 uses to compile stuff
(probably it's a left-over workaround from an ant bug on the javac task).
Now, not only I
YIKES!!!
-- dims
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 18:54:58 -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Stefano,
i think i poked through all the jars in JDK 1.4 and did not find
it...hence the question.
Found it!!!
The problem is in the XJavac task that