Stefano, my responses below...
Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/16/2004 05:51:17 PM:
[...]
A --(needs)-- B
and
B --(needs)-- A
Until today, i thought that no matter how well maintained, a dependency
graph would always be a general graph, and cycles would
Stefano:
see my responses below.
wade
Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/15/2004 09:40:28 PM:
[...]
What I was thinking is that this (and other of your suggestions) adds a
meta-metadata layer and I'm not sure if I want to add this complexity
at this point (given that
Leo:
Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/16/2004 02:46:14 AM:
[...]
yep, I seem to agree. Let's first implement the proposed setup and
optimize for understandability and cleanliness. Gump has a lot of
features already. Let's first focus on making the important ones easier
to use,
Stefano:
See my responses below.
Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/10/2004 02:21:48 PM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
In my Build Results system, I have a schema that also includes a few
additional things:
- abritrary groupings of projects, which helps in organizaing
Stefano,
Some afterthoughts. Hopefully to help clarify. The scope of a Project
in our system (currently) is that of a build (a series of builds) for a
given
instance of (1) product-release on a given (2) target. This of course
means that a single configuration for a given instance of #1 would
This is cool. FWIW, here's some bits from my experience, implemeting
something similar in a MySQL database.
In my Build Results system, I have a schema that also includes a few
additional things:
- abritrary groupings of projects, which helps in organizaing various
forms of the
:
wasWade Stebbings/Lawson
received
I was just reading about selling Gump, etc., and I had several thoughts.
I've been following the Gump lists for the past 10 months, joining because
I was impressed with Gump's data model. I have been looking into all
sorts of continuous integration/build systems for my company, including
Adam,
I think this is a great idea!
I know it would be very useful to me, if the operational, day-to-day stuff
were
in a separate list from the discussion. As an interested party to
continuous
integration ideas and implementations, in general, I joined this group.
But
I find myself having to
