Jules Gosnell wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry to change the subject...
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling
brings code over?
I don't
David Crossley wrote:
Geir's experiment was incomplete and he reported
difficulty with some docs. Perhaps the following
will help, or perhaps you already have a better
solution.
I just want people to stay informed over here. You can see David is keen
to support your move away from Forrest,
David Crossley wrote:
What is happening now? There was a flurry of +1 from
PMC members. What is the next step in moving to Anakia?
I was going to do the /project docs (as they seem to be critical).
At that point, I think all is there, and we could go forward. I may be
inspired today to
On 1/4/06, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a way to use Forrest itself to produce
xml output ...
0)
Assuming that forrest is installed as per:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
i've been following this debate (off and on) for
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 1/4/06, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a way to use Forrest itself to produce
xml output ...
0)
Assuming that forrest is installed as per:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
i've been following
So how does this work? Does the incubator also need to vote on this
or is it accepted for incubation based on the Lucene PMC vote?
I'm +1, for the record :)
Erik
On Jan 3, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC folks,
I would like to propose a new Apache
I know of at least half a dozen private implementations of exactly
this. I definitely would like to see some common cause oon it.
Will read proposal in more detail tomorrow morning!
-Brian
On Jan 3, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC folks,
I would like to propose a
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 22:40, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Isn't the incubator meant to lower the bar for projects wishing to
migrate into ASF ?
Not directly. Incubator is the buffer that is here to ensure that the ASF, its
members and to some degree its committers are given a low legal risk. That
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
What is happening now? There was a flurry of +1 from
PMC members. What is the next step in moving to Anakia?
I was going to do the /project docs (as they seem to be critical).
At that point, I think all is there, and we could go forward. I
So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with
the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision??
Sanjiva.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling
brings code over?
It is still being debated, so no. Roy's comments about import from private
vs public repositories may be a reasonable approach. Personally, I'm a
--On January 5, 2006 4:32:46 AM +0600 Sanjiva Weerawarana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with
the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision??
Noe one has called for a vote. -- justin
On 1/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with
the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision??
I don't believe there is a sponsoring PMC at this point.
Personally, I would prefer that the
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 1/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with
the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision??
I don't believe there is a sponsoring PMC at this point.
Dan Diephouse wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
Personally, I would prefer that the ASF not accept _any_ AJAX
framework at this point in time. The area is relatively new
and in a great deal of flux right now, and crowning one of
them with the ASF brand will create a de facto standard instead
On Jan 4, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Roy, what happens if I have a codebase, and I have one file in it that
imports or otherwise references third party GPL code, and I then
delete my
infected file? Do we have a concern about having that GPL infected
code in
SVN, even though
On 1/4/06, Dan Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 1/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with
the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision??
I don't
On 1/4/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Diephouse wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
Personally, I would prefer that the ASF not accept _any_ AJAX
framework at this point in time. The area is relatively new
and in a great deal of flux right now, and crowning one of
them
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-11-24 00:30:24 -0500 (Thu, 24 Nov 2005) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the
19 matches
Mail list logo
