Noel
There is a vote in progress on a new committer right now. Does that count?
I'm certainly keen on doing integration between Synapse and Tuscany and as
soon as I get a minute I will do it. I agree that cross-fertilization is
good.
Paul
On 10/21/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recent Tuscany 1.0 release included Ode integration with an
implementation.bpel component type. We also have experimental support
for integration with Geronimo.
In the last 2 months, 3 new committers have been added, one is in progress
as Paul has said, and one is being discussed. Of these
On 10/19/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
I think Tuscany is ready to graduate because:
1) I understand it to have met the base requirements of the IPMC in
terms
of
independent committers
Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from
On 10/20/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...This is the Tuscany community vote result thread which was only on
the
tuscany-dev list but seems to have inadvertently been replied to to the
general@ list
BTW, that
On 10/12/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its
graduation to a Top Level Project.
While incubating Tuscany has made 14(!) releases, voted in 19 new
committers, survived conflicts, formed its PPMC, learned how to govern
Ant Elder wrote:
Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from
independents?
If the bare minimum is the 3 legally independent committers as defined
in
the Incubator policy documents then Tuscany has more than the bare
minimum -
and thats active committers.
Can you compare
On 10/21/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ant Elder wrote:
Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from
independents?
If the bare minimum is the 3 legally independent committers as defined
in
the Incubator policy documents then Tuscany has more than the
On Oct 21, 2007, at 10:52 AM, ant elder wrote:
On 10/21/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ant Elder wrote:
Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from
independents?
If the bare minimum is the 3 legally independent committers as
defined
in
the Incubator
There didn't seem to be any curfuffle at all in floating the proposal
through the incubator. That's a good thing. Both containers are
heavily used, both originate from these parts and so it's somewhat
fitting they would like to return. I'll put up vote thread later today.
On 8 Oct 07, at
On 10/20/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Wouldn't the community be healthier if it focused some effort
on bringing in independent committers?
Its my understanding that the project is very focussed on encouraging
new committers and that this is
10 matches
Mail list logo
